About Me

Name: A View from...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

ATM Voting: If we can transfer billions without concern why can't we count a few million votes?

Why does it seem those charged with the responsibility to manage our elections cannot devise a simple system to record the voters’ wishes while maintaining a result that can be readily tracked? We can move billions of dollars through a global financial system without the hand wringing that something as simple as tracking a vote causes in this country.

When I transact business through my bank’s ATM (Automatic Teller Machine), I receive a document detailing the activity transacted, date, and a unique transaction number. If I were to dispute the transaction, I have a record that the bank can reconcile with its records to correct any errors. This system has enabled me to conduct my financial business across the globe without incident. I can also track this transaction on the bank’s internet site.

Would such a system that utilizes a teller-like machine work for elections?  A voter could enter their vote, review a summary of their preferences confirming its accuracy, submit their vote, and then receive a receipt noting voting results with a unique identifying or transaction number.

Such a system would overcome many of the “problems” encountered in past elections. Voters could review their preferences prior to submitting them to the election. The voting results with the transaction number would be posted on-line. Anyone could audit the results. A voter could then enter their transaction number and determine that their vote was properly recorded.

I am not aware of any current method of voting where one can prove that their vote was counted. This method would give greater comfort to those who believe they were disenfranchised.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »